I Read Comics: Show 86
Lene Taylor
I Read Comics podcast
I Read Comics: Show 86
I Read Comics, show number 86.
In case you didn't know it, Stan Lee is on Twitter.
And I think it just goes to show where Twitter has reached to, that Stan Lee should be on Twitter.
And, of course, when I found out that SmilinStanLee, which is his Twitter handle, was on Twitter, I immediately started following him.
And the coolest thing about it is that I think he and Twitter were pretty much made for each other.
Because if you look back at what he used to write for Stan's Soapbox and all his comments,
and even his editorial comments within the scripts of the comic books, those little boxes at the bottom where he would put some comment in, they were like tweets.
So he's been doing this since 1964.
And now he's just doing it to his, you know, gazillion followers.
In fact, let me check to see how many followers he has today as I'm recording this.
Okay, he's got almost 17,000 people following him on Twitter.
And I think he's hilarious.
And plus, he actually signs off.
Some of his tweets with Excelsior, which is just too funny to me.
I mean, it's the same way that Shatner signs off his tweets with My Best Bill, which is now, like, my joke for everything.
But, yeah, Stan Lee actually signs his tweets with Excelsior.
What could be better than that?
So I encourage you to go and follow Stan Lee on Twitter.
And I've become so obsessed with his tweets that I've actually started recording them and posting them as audio boos.
Because the guys on QPAW, on the Quiet Panelologists at Work podcast, had done at least one sketch.
I think they've done several about Stan Lee in their impression of how he talks in this sort of old man voice with this very heavy New York accent.
And he's always spouting off ideas and saying, Excelsior, all the time.
And whenever I read his tweets now, I have the QPAW voice of Stan Lee in my mind.
So I decided to read his tweets.
For my own amusement, basically, but if other people are amused by it, that's good.
And, you know, it's kind of gotten to the point where I don't really care if other people think it's funny.
I think it's funny.
So I do it to crack myself up.
So you can hear me read Stan Lee's wonderful tweets in my fake Stan Lee voice and enjoy them because it's really, really amusing.
And occasionally he does tell stories.
Whether they're true or not is a completely different matter.
But he does tell stories.
And you can...
You can find out what the hell he's doing because I was kind of wondering what he's up to.
Besides his cameo appearances in Marvel movies and writing introductions to other people's books,
he's still writing comics and coming up with new ideas about whatever enters into his crazy old head.
So there you go.
Oh, and he said he was going to record another thing.
Oh, for Kevin Smith.
That was it.
He tweeted this the other day.
You know, last year he read The Raven for Halloween.
And I had put that here on the iRead.com.
Because I thought it was so good.
And he says this year he's going to read, I think, The Night Before Christmas.
So that should be fun.
And if he does, I will certainly post the audio of that for you all to listen to.
Because it was great.
Didn't make it to APE this year.
Too much going on.
My mom was in the hospital.
She's fine.
But it meant a whole month of kind of running around and doing things.
And, of course, it was that weekend that APE was happening.
So what the hell.
I couldn't go.
Damn it.
But I am going to go to WonderCon next year.
For sure.
And what I did end up going to my night off was Wootstock in San Francisco.
Which was a whole lot of fun.
It was hosted by Will Wheaton and Paul and Storm, who are very funny musicians.
And Adam Savage was there and gave a great presentation about his hundred wishes.
Casper Hauser was there.
They did comedy.
There were lots of other people there.
Short films.
It was pretty much a geek fest.
And I enjoyed it very much.
So if they do Wootstock version 2.0, I encourage you to go see it.
A couple other newsy things that I just wanted to get out of the way.
I've been doing 52 songs on Mondays, mostly on Mondays, picking out things from my giant
record collection that I think people might want to hear.
And a couple weeks ago, I put up a full piece of one of the beautiful, beautiful Ginger
Mayerson compositions that you often hear in this show.
In fact, you'll hear one right after I get done with this segment.
Because I love her music.
And she's finally got all of it on a CD.
That you can buy.
Which is beautifully packaged.
It has one of her collages on the front and then inside on the disc.
And all of the art and packaging was done by Brad Rader, who we love.
So if you like her music, if you like the little parts of it that you've heard on this
show, I encourage you to go and buy the CD.
Because the money could not be going to a better cause.
And I think you will like it.
It's really good quality music.
And it makes you think.
I know that sounds weird.
But it really does make you think.
So go listen to that.
And, you know, let me know if you like the 52 songs.
I've been picking out loads of different things.
Some new stuff.
Some old stuff.
There's a lot of stuff I have that I need to convert to digital format.
Because it's only on vinyl.
Or it's only on cassette tape.
So I have to do that.
But I'm having a good time going through music.
And the emails that I've gotten so far have said, yeah, it's good.
Keep doing it.
I was also on another podcast.
The guys who do the Uncanny X-Cast decided to...
To start, maybe, a panel discussion.
Which they're calling Inside the Panel, I think.
And they had me and Ron from iFanboy and Louis Kwok.
And, oh gosh, I'm totally blanking on the whole cast there.
Oh, Brian from the X-Cast.
And it was really fun.
So they told us that they were going to do it with points, right?
And the people on the panel who were participating
had absolutely no fucking idea
how they were scoring these things.
So as we're going along, we're taking breaks
and we're all complaining and saying,
how are you scoring this?
And then I was shocked to find out
that me and Ron actually tied at the end.
Because I was just kind of talking nonsense
and giving opinions where I thought I actually had them.
But mostly talking nonsense, like I do.
So there you go.
But they're supposed to do it again.
And I said I would love to be on it again
because it was pretty much fun.
And so if you haven't listened to it,
go and give a listen.
There was a whole bunch of different topics
that we talked about, including old stuff and new stuff
and whether Peter David is a hypocrite
and bagging and boarding and all sorts of things like that.
But it was really fun.
I put the link for it at my blog,
at the iReadComics blog.
Let's see.
Oh, and one other thing.
You know, I have, through my dear friend, Ginger Magerson,
I've been writing various things
for the different things from the Wapshot Press.
Which I love the name of.
And the newest thing that has just been published
is a collection of smut.
And it's called Erotique.
And I have a story in it.
And it's a het story.
And I think it's a cute story called Oh Margaret.
And it actually should be Oh Margaret,
the way Bugs Bunny used to say it.
So I wrote it quite a while ago.
And it never really found a home.
I submitted it to a couple other places for publishing.
And then I stopped doing that because I got bored with it.
But then when Ginger said,
she had this new thing,
I said, oh, I've got a perfect story for you.
So it's good.
And the other stories are good as well.
And it has a beautiful, beautiful cover
by Carl Christian, who is the Byron guy.
So I would encourage you to buy that
if you like that kind of thing.
It's only $4.50 until December 1st.
And then it goes up to $6.50.
What a bargain for the kind of smutty writing
that you'll get in there.
So on to the reviews.
And let's keep going with the smut
as long as I'm talking about the smut.
Wonderful, wonderful.
Dale Lazaroff sent me a galley,
a PDF galley of his new book, Nightlife,
which is another compilation of wordless,
short, smutty, gay stories.
And it's beautiful.
He sent it to me a while ago.
And I felt like a jerk for not getting around to it.
I mean, of course, I read it as soon as I got it.
And I said, ooh, this is good.
But I just hadn't gotten around to talking about it on the show.
So it's available now.
It's out now through Amazon.
So Nightlife by Dale Lazaroff.
And the artist here is Bastian Johnson.
And it's beautiful color.
It has three separate stories in it.
And like the other collection of his work, Manly,
which was drawn by Amy Colburn,
it's a really nice collection of fun,
really hot, smutty, gay comics.
And as with the other collection,
with the Manly collection, there's no dialogue.
It's all silent.
So every story has to be told just through,
through the scenes and what the characters are doing.
And there are little stories that go along with each one of them.
Of course, most of it is sex.
And the sex is really hot.
But there are nice little stories,
especially in the last story.
So like the other stories in Manly,
the really great things are that
you see a variety of different guys,
different ethnicities, different body types.
Of course, they're all really hot.
And of course, they have big cocks, which is great.
But some of them are older.
Some of them are younger.
Some of them are white.
A lot of them are not white.
They look like they're from different socioeconomic classes,
which is always good.
So it's really nice to see a mix of people like that.
And there's lots of safe sex, which is good.
So lots of condoms to be found.
The very first story that's in here
has some dildo play in it,
which is kind of neat to see.
And as I was reading this,
I was thinking about something I said to Logan the other day.
So I'll give Logan a quick plug for his blog,
loganotron.com.
He blogs a lot because he's younger than me
and he has the energy for it.
But he usually does on Wednesdays
what he calls hump day hotness,
which are pictures that he finds of really hot guys,
usually gay, but not always.
And he likes to put up as many as he can find.
So I love his hump day hotness posts
because they're hot and I like looking at those guys.
But we were both agreeing
that two things that they need more of
in pictures of hot guys,
and in porn in general,
straight porn, gay porn,
is more guys with hairy chests
because we're really both tired of the shaved chest thing
just over it now.
And people smiling and having fun.
Everybody in the hot pictures,
they're always pouting
or they look like they're angry about something
or they look like they have a stick up their butt.
And I don't mean that in a good way.
But why do they look so pissed off all the time?
Is that supposed to be hot?
Is that supposed to turn you on
that somebody looks like
they're in a bad mood?
It doesn't work for me, that's for sure.
And in Dale's nightlife stories,
the guys look like they're really having fun.
They're making out with each other
and they're smiling and they're laughing
and they're cuddling
and they just really look like
they're having a good time.
You know, I'm as much a fan of angsty sex
as anybody else,
but it is really refreshing
to see good looking guys
looking like they're having a good time
having sex.
So that is probably the best thing
about this collection.
Yay for having fun having sex.
They look playful.
They look like sex is a good thing
and not angsty.
Enough, enough angst.
So, yes, these little stories
are all really good.
Like I said, lots of safe sex,
lots of fun stuff that happens in them.
Interesting background in a lot of them.
You see different people.
The other thing, too, about these stories,
and I find the same thing is true
mostly of the same people,
the Steve McIsaac stories, too,
is that, again, not angsty.
The gay guys are happy being gay.
They're not hiding it.
In fact, guys in these stories
make out on the street.
They're making out on the subway.
You know, it's just like,
hey, we're gay and that's it.
And it doesn't matter.
And it's not like a secret
and it's not like something to be ashamed of.
And boy, that's nice to see also.
So, to get to the last story,
because I thought that one
had a really nice story arc to it.
And it made me laugh a little bit
because, and this story is called,
let me tell you,
Closing Time.
Okay, they do have titles.
It starts off in a nightclub
that's a church.
And it clearly is supposed to be
the limelight in New York.
Here it's called Salvation.
But it made me laugh because, you know,
when I lived on the East Coast,
I went there and we always called it
the slime light.
And I don't know why people
really like going there.
It was really loud and cold
and the acoustics weren't good.
So anyway, it takes place at this club
and the two main characters
are the bouncer, who's an older guy,
and then a younger punky guy
who's really big and built
and he has a mohawk.
And you don't find out until about
a third of the way into a story
that he's actually wearing
a leather jacket
and then hot pants and fishnet
tights and army boots.
And it looks, it's funny.
It's a hot, but it's still,
it was very incongruous to me.
I was like, oh, he's wearing
fishnet stockings.
So he obviously got a thing
for dressing up.
And he leaves this club
with another guy
and then they get hassled
by some assholes
and the bouncer comes to the rescue
with a baseball bat.
So that's good.
And then the two of them
end up together
and end up going to
punk guy's apartment,
which is a shithole.
And they,
they do a little bit of dress up
and then they have really,
really hot sex.
And the older dude
is not a daddy in that way.
He's not a total top.
They both take turns
in different positions
and fucking each other
in different ways.
And at the end of it,
there's lots and lots of cuddling.
And then the very last panel
on that one is the two of them
in the kitchen in the morning.
And it's not clear
whose kitchen it is.
It's, it's one of theirs
and they're just sitting there
reading the paper,
drinking coffee.
Looks like maybe
they're living together
at that point.
And it's really nice.
All these three stories
have happy endings.
And it's so nice
to see happy endings.
I don't know if you can tell,
but I'm really smiling
as I'm talking about this.
And I love the fact that
this kind of porn
can make me smile
and feel so happy about it
and not be all angsty.
So as with all of
Dale Lazaro's work,
highly, highly recommend this.
And the art is beautiful too.
I was not familiar
with this particular artist,
Bastion Johnson.
Let me flip to the end
and see what it says about him.
And then I can tell you
what the hell he's done.
I'll make it even
a little bit bigger.
It's kind of nice looking at it
on a PDF like this.
He's a self-taught comic artist,
illustrator and graphic designer
and lifelong comics addict.
Well, aren't we all?
He lives and works
in a very small town
nestled in the endless
moose infested forests
of rural,
Sweden on the border
with Norway
with his sweet,
long-suffering
veterinary boyfriend,
one extremely spoiled
German shepherd
and far, far too many horses.
It's his first
full-length book.
His art also appears
in Stripped, Uncensored.
A sporadically updated
illustrated blog
can be found at
boytoygraphics.com.
So there you go.
So, yay, nightlife.
Woo!
Okay, I am going to
take a break
in a moment.
But first,
I want to ask a question.
And tell you,
well, I'll tell you
about this book
that I got.
I went to the library
and I was looking
at the new stuff
and I see this book
by Brian Cronin
called
Was Superman a Spy?
and other comic legends
revealed.
So I look in the front
and it says
he's the writer
and producer
of Comics Should Be Good.
Oh, I know
Comics Should Be Good.
It's that blog
where he talks about
comic urban legends.
So what he did
was he took all of that stuff
and he made a book out of it.
It's pretty good.
I had read
a lot of this stuff
before on his blog.
But I think he found
a nice way
to kind of stitch it up
into a book
and not make it seem
too choppy.
It's basically divided
into Marvel and DC.
And he goes through
a lot of urban legends
but also kind of
a history of the comics.
A lot of focus
on the big characters
at each one.
So there's
chapter on Superman,
chapter on Batman,
and then chapter
on Spider-Man,
chapter on Fantastic Four.
So it's really good.
And I think
it's a good book
for people maybe
who aren't that
into comics.
To give them
a lot of background.
If you're interested
in that sort of thing.
I kind of think
that if you are
a real comics
nerd,
fanatic,
geek,
you might know
a lot of it.
But there might be
a couple of gems in there.
So,
good book.
And it's a nice
paperback-y size.
And it's got
cute illustrations too.
But here's the thing.
So I was reading
through the Marvel chapters
and here's a section
on Mark Grunewald.
He was a beloved
editor and writer
at Marvel Comics
for many years.
He wrote for
Captain America.
But the work
that he was most proud
of at Marvel
was Squadron Supreme.
Note,
I never heard
of Squadron Supreme.
Created by
Roy Thomas
as a joke
between Thomas,
then writer
of The Avengers,
and Denny O'Neill,
then writer
of DC's Justice League,
the Squadron was made up
of analogs
to DC's Justice League.
Hyperion was Superman,
Nighthawk was Batman,
Power Princess
was Wonder Woman,
etc.
The Squadron Supreme
lived on an alternate Earth.
In 1985,
Grunewald did
a 12-issue series
detailing
what happened
when the Squadron Supreme
decided to use
their powers
to fix our Earth
by taking it
over themselves.
It was a brilliant look
at the realistic
demonstration
of what superheroes
could do
in the real world
and whether it was
something that would
be at all beneficial
for society.
A benevolent tyranny
is still tyranny.
This series
is well remembered
as one of the first
serious comics
and Alan Moore's
classic series
Watchmen,
which began the next year,
is similar in scope.
So,
never heard of
Squadron Supreme
and I went,
oh,
you know,
I'd like to read that
and then I was going
through a box of books
and,
fuck,
here's the Squadron Supreme
trade paperback,
which I think
David Arroyo
sent to me.
So, David,
I'm really sorry
that I never thanked you
for Squadron Supreme before,
but now I'm going to say
thank you
because I really
wanted to read it
and it, like,
appeared by magic
in my hands
and it's got an
Alex Ross cover,
which is really good.
So, my question
to you guys,
I haven't read it yet,
is,
is it good?
Is it what
Brian Cronin thinks it is?
Is it really,
like,
Watchmen before Watchmen
or what?
I can't tell
by looking at it
except that the art
is really kind of pretty
and the trade paperback
format seems kind of neat.
I'm a little disturbed
because there's a
pregnant woman
on the front
who has really,
really,
really big hair
and then there's
another woman
who I guess is
Power Princess
who is weirdly
disproportionate.
Like,
her top half
is really big
and her bottom half
is really big.
Her bottom half
is really strong
and, you know,
Alex Ross is usually
better than that.
So, I couldn't quite tell
what's going on.
But anyway,
I'm excited to read
Squadron Supreme
so if people have
opinions about
Squadron Supreme,
I would really like
to hear it
before I get into it
and believe me,
I will take your
opinion seriously
and if I disagree
with you,
you know,
then let's talk
because I'd like to know.
Okay,
quick break
and then I want to
talk about this
stupid Jason book
and tell you why
I don't think
it's any good.
So, let's get started.
Okay,
let me tell you
a happy thing
before we do
the Jason book.
Chris Wisnia,
my good friend
Chris Wisnia,
who is now
with Slave Labor Graphics,
yay,
has an illustration
in the new issue
of Skeptic Magazine.
He did the cover
for Junior Skeptic
and it's awesome.
It's very much
in the Doris Danger vein
and there's a lake monster
coming up out of the lake
and terrorizing a guy
and it's beautiful
and I'm so happy
that he did it
and in my vein
and egotistical way,
I'd like to think
that my introduction
of Chris
to the Point of Inquiry folks
and the skeptical community
got him that job
and probably that's not true
but I'm going to tell myself
that it's true
because, you know,
I'd like to make myself
feel good.
Okay.
So, you know,
I've reviewed a book
by Jason once before
and fuck me
if I can remember
what it was
but I thought it had
some good things in it.
This is his new book
and I saw it advertised
on the Fantagraphics site
because it's published
by Fantagraphics
and I thought,
well, that could be interesting
and they had it at the library
so I got it
and I guess my comment is
I don't get it
and I can't tell
if I don't get it
because,
it's not meant for me to get
and I understand
that some things
are not meant for me to get
like,
I don't know,
the Jonas Brothers.
I don't get the Jonas Brothers
but I don't think
they're aimed at me
so that's okay.
Like, there are some commercials
on TV
that I don't get
and they're not aimed at me
so that's okay.
I don't get Jason
and I think it's because
it appeals to some other demographic
than me.
And it took me
about, I don't know,
20 minutes to read
this whole book.
It's a beautiful book.
It's hardcover.
It's beautifully colored.
Each page has four panels in it
and the reproduction
is really nice
and crisp and clean
and it's printed
on heavy stock
and it's the kind of book
where you pick it up
and you want to like it
because it's so nice.
It's just a beautiful object.
But I don't get it.
It's not funny.
And I went all the way
through it before
I kind of realized
that it was supposed
to be funny.
Okay, there's one funny thing in it
but that's about it.
So there's four stories,
oh sorry,
five stories in here.
The first one's called
Emily Says Hello.
Then there's the one
that's called Low Moon.
Then there's one
that's just Ampersand.
Another one that's
Proto Film Noir
and the other is
You Are Here.
And Jason,
if you don't know who he is,
if you saw his art
you'd know it immediately.
He uses
anthropomorphic animals
that look like animals.
They look a lot like
the barn animals
that used to be
in really, really old
Disney and Warner Brothers cartoons.
They're sort of
unidentifiable
as exactly what kind of animal
they're supposed to be.
Like are they cows
or goats
or something?
And it's just the heads.
Like the bodies
look like
people bodies
and then they all have
bare feet
even though they wear clothes.
So they have
blank eyes also.
They just,
they just have circles for eyes.
There's no actual eyes
for any of them
and they don't talk very much.
And, you know,
he's Norwegian
and maybe that's another thing
that I don't get
that there's some kind of humor there
that's just so dry
or dark
that it's beyond black
that it's into some color spectrum
that I am not familiar with
or maybe it exists
on a parallel world.
I just don't know.
So let me just tell you
about one of the stories.
The first story is called
Emily Says Hello
and it starts off
with a guy
knocks on the door
goes to this woman's apartment.
They're talking a little bit
and we find out
through the dialogue
that the guy
went to the house
of a man
and killed him.
And right before he killed him
he said
Emily says hello
and he took a picture
of the dead guy
and made a recording
of the moment
when he was dead.
And he said to the guy
Emily says hello
and kills him.
So in exchange for this
and we figure
it's the woman
who asked him to do it
she lets him feel her up.
And then he leaves
and she takes the picture
and puts it on the wall.
And then the same thing happens
and the second time
she gives him a pair
of her underwear
and the third time
she gives him a hand job
and then the fourth time
she blows him
and so he's killing these people
and eventually
by the fifth time
he says the cops
are following him
but he killed the guy anyway
and he's you know
cops are following him
up to this woman's apartment
and they're knocking
at the door
and finally he says
who is she?
Who is Emily?
And the woman looks at him
and then she jumps out the window
and she's closing her eyes
and she's kind of
falling in blackness
and in the very last panel
she opens her eyes again.
That's the end of the story.
I don't get it.
There's so many things
that it could be
and okay
I guess maybe
I get the point
that you're supposed to
think of what happened to her
or why she wanted
these guys killed
and was she Emily
or okay.
A little existential.
So then we get to the second one
which is called Low Moon
and it's like a western
except people have cell phones
and there's a bar
and they don't serve liquor there
they only have
it's like a coffee bar
even though it looks like
a real old western bar
and it revolves around
oh it's just like
every western story
where there's a sheriff
and the guy who had to leave town
because something happened
between him and the sheriff
and then he comes back
and they have a showdown
except the showdown in this case
is not with guns
it's playing chess
and then at the end
they're like
the sheriff beats him
and he ends up marrying
the girl that he loves
and the guy that he beat
the outlaw
does he leave town?
I can't even fucking remember
I have to look
no he doesn't leave town
nobody knows what happens to him
but
I can't even follow
the thread of this story
that's the end
that's what happens
nothing else actually happens
in it
except there are some women
who have no roles at all
except to be
either the possessions of the men
or the objects of their desire
and one of them of course
is a prostitute
and has to leave town at the end
presumably for a better life
somewhere else
and then there's another one
that's got like
some parallel story
of guys who can't make themselves happy
and then this other one
oh god
this is the thing
that annoyed me most of all
it's this weird story
about a guy
and you think
it takes place in
you know
prehistoric times
because he's dressed like a caveman
but then he comes to a house
and he has sex with this woman
and then he decides
that he has to kill her husband
and then the whole plot of the story is
every morning
as the two of them are sitting there
the husband comes back
and the guy has to kill him again
and he does this every day
and it goes on
and on
and I can't tell you
how many different times
he kills the guy
in all these different ways
and then he goes to a house
and he has sex with this woman
but it's like
could you beat that joke
into the ground
any further
I mean
it just goes on
and it doesn't get any funnier for me
the more it goes on
it's not like
it builds to hilarity
and the ways that he kills them
don't get funnier
or more imaginative
or crazier
or Bugs Bunny-ish
or anything like that
I mean
he drowns him in a bathtub
he pushes him off a cliff
I don't know
and then the final time
when the husband doesn't show up
the woman clunks him over the head
with a rolling pin
and then the final joke
is that
he gets put in
a cell by the police
with
I can't really tell
it's the husband
or guys who played the husband
or ghosts of the husband
there's a bunch of them
and he says
I knew something like this
was going to happen
okay
was that supposed to be funny?
it wasn't funny
so here's the review
from Publishers Weekly
at Amazon
Low Moon is actually a collection
of five marvelously deadpan
short stories
the expressionless
anthropomorphic animals
who populate his comics
milk understatement
for all the laughs it's worth
they manage to look bored
and detached
even when their brandishing
sores are not
the core of Jason's
breed of humor
is his protracted silences
the uproariously
uncomfortable moments
when his characters
are standing around
waiting for disaster
to strike
they're not uproarious
if you want to talk about
uproariously uncomfortable moments
you know
go watch The Office
the British one
those are uproariously
uncomfortable
these aren't
these are just
jokes with too much
space in between them
they're just
if this stuff was performed live
people would be falling asleep
or walking out
and yeah
the characters do look
bored and detached
and you know what
that made me feel
bored and detached
it's really really hard for me
to connect with characters
in a story
when none of the characters
seems to care about
what's happening
nobody's shocked
nobody's scared
nobody's happy
nobody's joyous
nobody in these stories
is anything
they have desires
and you can't tell
why they act on them
in one of the other stories
a character commits suicide
and nobody cares
and I just find it
really really hard
to care about characters
who don't care about anything
and maybe that's
my main complaint
they're not funny
because
nothing about it
is funny
there's nothing funny
about people
who don't care
funny is when people
care really passionately
about something
and look very silly
when they're doing it
you know
that's comedy
so if somebody
has another theory
as to why Jason
should be funny
and why I'm not getting it
I would really like
to know it
because
I kind of feel stupid
when I don't get something
but
you know
maybe I should just
let it go
just let it go
and say you know
this comic isn't for me
I don't need to get it
I didn't buy it
so I can just
take it back to the library
and let it go
now I'm going to do
something in real time
I'm going to
stop recording this podcast
I'm going to go
watch a movie
and then come back
and talk about it
I still haven't watched
Watchmen
I have the disc
I've had it since I
got it from Amazon
when I pre-ordered it
but I think I'm actually
going to go downstairs
and pop it in
on my beautiful TV
and watch Watchmen
and let you know
what I think
so have a little bit more
wonderful Ginger Mayerson music
and I'll be back in a minute
for a break
you
will hear
I'll be back
come back
you
will hear
I'll be back
you
o
I'll be back
holy god that was a long movie it's now 11 30 apology if i'm a little incoherent but
that was like watching a lord of the rings movie i was watching my dvd with the director's cut
which was three hours long and it felt like three hours whoa it actually felt like reading
watchmen from cover to cover which takes you longer than three hours i'm sure but man oh
i'm so tired um i'm not gonna review it scene by scene because so many people have done that
already i will just give the highlights and a few lowlights it was really good i thought they
did an amazing job zach snyder did an amazing job of taking the enormity the ginormity of
watchmen the the whole thing and bringing it to the screen and as with other adaptations
and referencing lord of the rings again i can see why he changed certain things and i think he was
right to change certain things especially the ending because the squid thing would never have
worked just no uh so i like the way he wrapped that up um it seemed to make sense and it was very
gripping and got them a chance to show off some more really cool special effects which i'm sure
they're gonna steal for that stupid movie 2012 that's coming out um in a couple of weeks so i
like that and i liked some of the other things that he did and i think it's a really good movie
changes that happened along the way and i've been reading um about the differences in the
versions and what the director's cut has that the other ones didn't although i can't kind of
bring it to mind but it felt like just about everything that was in the book was crammed in
there and i mean crammed in there there was a lot of stuff put in there so it was it was really good
um the one you know rorschach there he is on the screen
this time uh and that was an amazing performance by jackie haley but um you know he was more
emotional than i had always seen him in my mind in the book and part of that is the way
his word balloons are drawn in the book that when he's wearing the mask he's to me he always seems
to be speaking in a monotone he never uses any exclamation points i think i pointed this
out once before but his speech is always very even and he often doesn't use um pronouns when
he talks and they carried a lot of that through into the movie but there was definitely more
emotion coming through and maybe they just tried it the other way with him being completely
monotone and pretty much devoid of emotion and found that that didn't work and that
the audience couldn't connect to him at all that way i mean he's a pretty hard character to connect
to anyway
but that probably made him even even less somebody that you could identify with and you have to
identify with him to make any sense of the story because when by the time you get to the end
you have to be with rorschach and saying people need to know the truth you can't be on the other
side with adrian and dr manhattan saying no it's all right for people to live a lie you have to
believe rorschach's point of view and that makes his death all the more tragic
um so i i thought that that was good and um some of the violence was shall i say
cartoony comic booky um especially the scene in prison now i know that i spent a lot of
time complaining about the scene in prison where the fat guy whatever his name is lawrence i guess
is sacrificed so that they can break into rorschach cell to kill him and the way they do it in the
book is that the other um inmate is says oh i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm
who's the in the thrall of big picture just cuts his throat and then they cut into the cell and of
course in the movie here comes the spoiler they cut his arms off to get him out of the way which
was so gross and you know I'm just thinking that they saw that scene in the book and said you know
this doesn't really make any fucking sense and they decided to change it and they went for the
grossest thing possible so that was pretty horrible and you know the amount of violence in it was
pretty high I would say not that it was gratuitous I don't think a lot of it was
gratuitous I think some of it was gratuitous and it for me it a little bit dulled the edge
of the real violence that's supposed to shock you you know when that guy gets his arms cut off
in the prison you have to laugh you go I mean I literally was sitting on my couch going oh no
but I was laughing at the same time because it was just funny and
that makes you react with a lot less horror to actual horrible horrible violence that occurs
throughout the movie also the scene where Adrian is attacked and presumably someone's trying to
assassinate him in the book of course his secretary is shot and in the movie she gets
well in the book she's shot dead and in the movie she gets shot and it's really graphic you know the
bullet goes through her leg and then a couple of her fingers get blown
off oh that was really painful to watch and I felt like that was gratuitous and not only was
it gratuitous but she was very much just there to serve the purpose of being made an example of
let's see what kind of cool effects we can do with violent gory stuff on the screen and in the book
that character serves pretty much no purpose at all except to get shot instead of Adrian and he
deserves her but this was just for me a little over the top you know watching I guess it was
Lee Iacocca who actually got drilled made me laugh also and you know just juxtaposing those two
things I guess I don't know that probably says something about me as a viewer that I would laugh
that Lee Iacocca would get shot right between the eyes and then shot some more but that I feel
really horrible when a woman gets two fingers of her hand blown off in graphic detail blood
spurting and flying everywhere that was pretty awful um the other i thought the other actors
were really good uh everybody in the cast i thought did a fine fine job of making that transition
i will say that um the costumes were terrific but the wigs were awful um you could really see
and i don't know if this is true in the movies because i didn't see the movies but on the dvd
certainly you could really see that they were wearing wigs they didn't look like real hair at
all they looked like really bad wigs as bad as one of william shatner's bad toupees was how the wigs
looked and uh that was distracting to me stuff like that really takes me out of the movie and
makes me go wow couldn't they have done a better job with adrian's hair that's the fakiest looking
blonde wig on a guy i've ever seen in my life so i think they should have paid more attention to
that um and the old age makeup
on janie slater and on sally jupiter was also really bad um they didn't look the age that they
were supposed to look at all at one point sally says i'm 67 she doesn't look anywhere near 67
um they did some old age makeup stuff on her throat and around her mouth but her brow her eyes
are completely smooth like botox even and i don't think that was the effect that they were going for
and the thing with janie when she comes into the movie uh sorry tv studio where dr manhattan's being
interviewed by presumably ted koppel um i know she's wearing a wig but even when she takes the
wig off she certainly doesn't look like a woman who's old enough to have been a physicist at the
time when she was supposed to um you know she doesn't look like she's 60 she looks like a 35
year old actress wearing a little bit of old age makeup
that just broke the realism of it i mean realism in a science fiction movie yeah i need to believe
that whereas the people who were genuinely old like the actor who played hollis looked like an
old dude and matt frewer who was fantastic i love matt frewer it just took me a minute to recognize
him as mullock and i was like oh i love him he's so good i mean he looked like an old dude um and
all the other people who were genuinely old looked like they were old so especially on the women i
think they were really old and i think they were really old and i think they were really old and
they should have found a better way to do it or or worked harder on the old age makeup because
that definitely broke my suspension of disbelief there
the piece tacked on at the end uh so the thing happens in antarctica and john leaves and then
we have a little scene with janie and her mom making up oh that's really nice i liked it better
in the book and then she and dan kind of figuring out that they're going to go crime fighting again
i guess
um it was hilarious to me that he says dan says i think we'll be all right in the end and and uh
laurie says john would say it never ends and i thought yeah he did say that actually in the book
and it would have been a lot more effective if john had said it instead of laurie because it
doesn't really have the same kind of effect coming out of her mouth i didn't like that i thought that
was just too
like we can't leave it in this really really depressing way
um and i also thought that it was a lot less ambiguous in the final scene than it was in the
book so in the book when the seymour at the new frontiersman finds rorschach's journal it's really
unclear whether he recognizes it for what it is and is actually going to do something about it or
is just literally going to throw it into the trash in the movie that's going to be the end of the
that character seymour seems a lot more with it and i think you're supposed to understand that he is
going to read it and believe it and publish it and everybody is going to know the truth so
um i don't know i i guess for a movie you need to take that ambiguity away for that particular thing
um but i don't know i i guess i liked in the book the fact that you really don't know what's
going to happen um i i
i'm kind of wishing i'd seen the movie version and i guess i don't even know if it's on my set
maybe it's on the other disc the actual release version or maybe i can rent it or something just
to see how it's different from the director's version and i haven't gone through any of the
special features that are on there uh i saw that there's going to be another edition of it that's
coming out i guess for christmas and i don't know what the hell that's going to have in it but you
know i've got this and i'm not enough of a freak to have to go and buy yet another version of the
i already did that with all the lord of the rings movies i don't need to do it again
so um yeah definitely two thumbs up for watchmen oh you know i thought it was interesting that in
the movie they actually refer to their group of crime fighters as watchmen which i don't think
ever actually happens in the book the original group of crime fighters is called minute men
but they never have a name after that um they try when they're getting together
to call themselves things i can't remember what they are but they never actually say watchmen
but they actually said watchmen a couple times which i thought was interesting i guess they
really needed to hammer that home to the movie audience that when the title of a movie is watch
men you actually need to have a group of people called the watchmen or else you might not understand
that whole stuff about who watches the watchers so let's talk about um the let's talk about high
heels
let's talk about laurie's high heels i was disappointed that her heels were as high as
they were because they were very very high even in the scenes where she's just walking around when
she's having lunch or dinner with dan they show her walking across the street she's wearing
impossibly high heels in fact they're so high that the actress can barely walk in them and this is
not so in the book she doesn't wear like cripplingly high heels all the time and when she's being the
silk specter she's wearing high heels and she's wearing high heels and she's wearing high heels
too she also has ridiculously high heels like way way higher than you can really walk in
comfortably most of the time but you know i guess they figured she had to look sexy as if it wasn't
enough that she was wearing you know this skintight outfit with a lot of legs showing they had to put
the highest heels they could now astute viewers of star trek the old series will know that when
had to run around and do fight scenes, especially in the Gorn episode, Arena.
He didn't wear his regular boots all the time.
It's very clear that he's wearing little flat wrestling boots with no heels on them
because all of the boots that they wore on the show had Cuban heels on them
that were at least an inch, maybe even a little higher in Shatner's case.
But they couldn't risk him twisting his ankle and getting hurt,
so you'll see in that and in Shore Leave and a couple other episodes
where he's outside running around, he's wearing flat-soled wrestler's boots.
In the movie, in the fight scene in the prison, she's not wearing high heels.
She's wearing flat-soled, what I guess are wrestler's boots.
So the costume was so impractical that even the stunt person who was fighting
couldn't wear them to do the scene.
Stunts, she had to wear flat-soled wrestler's boots.
What is wrong with this picture?
If a stunt person can't function in heels like that,
why would an actual human who's supposedly a crime fighter be able to do in them?
I'm really tired of the high heel thing.
You know, really and truly, if you listen to us talking on the Uncanny X cast,
there was a question about high heels, and I answered it very flippantly.
It just pisses me off, and I don't care what anybody says about how some women
are able to walk in them or run around in them.
Maybe they are, and I'm sure it took them years to learn how to do that,
and it's still uncomfortable, and it's still impractical,
and if you fall and twist your ankle while you're wearing a pair of high heels,
it's going to hurt like hell, and you're probably going to break your ankle
instead of maybe just twisting it if you were wearing sneakers or something more practical.
So, please don't tell me that it's possible, because I don't care.
No actual woman who was trying to fight crime would ever wear high heels like that.
It just doesn't make any sense.
Trust me on this.
So, anyway, I was extremely, it made me really, really happy, and I was watching.
I was probably the only person who watched that whole fight sequence with my eyes trained on her feet
to see what she was wearing, and I was gratified.
I was gratified to see that she was not wearing high heels.
So, there.
Fuck you, high heels, and fuck you, Zack Snyder.
Well, I think that's going to bring us to the end of the show.
It's really late, and I need to get to bed after three hours of Watchmen.
I don't know what the hell my dreams are going to be like tonight,
but I'm actually a little scared.
Maybe I should go have a drink or something before I fall asleep.
So, until next time, go and subscribe to Smiling Stanley on Twitter.
Believe me, you won't regret it.
ΒΆΒΆ
guitar solo
Continue listening and achieve fluency faster with podcasts and the latest language learning research.